We are trying to find out what handling is the best for our batteries, thus we are happy about each costumer that gives a feedback about his car.
| Nickname | Purchased | Battery Health Status (%) | Date measured | Charges per week | Charging power (kW) | Charging place | Km (x1000) | Car |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fesch | 2013.05 | 102 | 2017.01 | 2-3 | 3,7 | closed garage | 28 | Zoé |
| Daniel | 2013.08 | 89 | 2015.10 | 2-4 | 43 | open carport | 21 | Zoé |
| Jeroen | 2013.11 | 91 | 2015.10 | 7 | 3,7 | open | 30 | Zoé |
| Jesper | 2011.11 | 97 | 2015.10 | 2-3 | 3,7 | open | Zoé | |
| Rémy | 2011.12 | 84 | 2015.10 | 2-4 | 3,7 | open | 39 | Fluence |
| Andy | 2013.10 | 94 | 2015.10 | 1-2 | 7 | open | 19 | Zoé |
| Berndte | 2013.03 | 102 | 2015.10 | 5-7 | 22-43 | open | 47 | Zoé |
| Tor | 2015.04 | 100 | 2015.10 | 5-7 | 11 | open | 12 | Zoé (Q210) |
| Ole | 2015.06 | 100 | 2015.10 | 7-15 | 3,7 & 22 | open carport | 22 | Zoé |
| Sandy | 2014.06 | 98 | 2015.10 | 1.5-2 | 7 & 43 | open | 13 | Zoé |
| Sandy | 2014.06 | 90 | 2017.01 | 1.5-2 | 7 & 43 | open | 17 | Zoé |
| Sandy | 2014.06 | 88 | 2017.05 | 1.5-2 | 7 & 43 | open | 26 | Zoé |
| Sandy | 2014.06 | 85 | 2017.05 | 1.5-2 | 7 & 43 | open | 27 | Zoé |
| Fer | 2015.05 | 87 | 2015.10 | 6-7 | 9.0 | closed garage | 12 | Zoé (Q210) |
| Fer | 2015.02 | 91 | 2015.10 | 6-7 | 4.6 | closed garage | 18 | Zoé (Q210) |
| Tho | 2013.06 | 93 | 2015.10 | 7-10 | 11-43 | open | 25 | Zoé |
| Ritxi | 2012.02 | 78 | 2015.10 | 5-7 | 3.3 | closed garage | 66 | Fluence |
| Henrik | 2014.05 | 105 | 2015.10 | 2-4 | 2.4 | open | 18 | Fluence |
| Fivari | 2013.12 | 101 | 2015.11 | 2 | 6.5 | closed garage | 28 | Zoé |
| Schouf26 | 2013.03 | 102 | 2015.11 | 7 | 22 | open garage | 74 | Zoé |
| Jimbo | 2014.11 | 99 | 2015.11 | 3-4 | 3.6 | carport | 10 | Zoé |
| mmezo | 2014.06 | 102 | 2015.11 | 1-2 | 3 | closed garage | 4 | Zoé |
| mmezo | 2014.06 | 102 | 2015.11 | 2 | 3 | closed garage | 6 | Zoé |
| Sten | 2013.06 | 92 | 2015.11 | 1-2 | 7 & 22 | open carport | 21 | Zoé |
| ener73 | 2013.06 | 102 | 2015.12 | 4-5 | 7.4 & 22 | closed garage | 62 | Zoé |
| Arthur | 2013.07 | 89 | 2015.12 | 1-3 | 11-22 | open carport | 27 | Zoé (Q210) |
| Crf | 2015.12 | 105 | 2015.12 | 7 | 2 | open carport | 2 | Zoe (R240) |
| GertjanVB | 2013.10 | 89 | 2015.12 | 3-7 | 3.7 | open | 44 | Zoé |
| JoDa | 2014.06 | 92 | 2015.12 | 6 | 11 | closed garage | 27 | Zoé |
| cece74 | 2013.04 | 86 | 2015.12 | 6 | 3.7 | closed garage | 51 | Zoé |
| Claude | 2013.05 | 86 | 2016.01 | 2-3 | 11 | closed garage | 32 | Zoé |
| Tim | 2013.09 | 89 | 2016.01 | 2-3 | 7 & 43 | open | 52 | Zoé (Q210) |
| Tim | 2015.09 | 100 | 2016.01 | 2-3 | 3.7, 7 & 43 | open | 9 | Zoé (Q210) |
| Grejazi | 2014.06 | 109 | 2016.02 | 7-21 | 2.3 & 3.7 | closed garage / carport | 19 | Fluence |
| THellweg | 2014.08 | 94 | 2016.02 | 5-7 | 22 | open | 35 | Zoe (Q210white) |
| THellweg | 2015.12 | 96 | 2016.02 | 5-7 | 22 | open | 11 | Zoe (Q210black) |
| Alexc | 2013.12 | 86 | 2016.02 | 1-2 | 22 | open | 50 | Zoe (R240grey) |
| lingley | 2013.06 | 85 | 2016.02 | 3-7 | 2.4-43 | closed garage | 42 | Zoe (Q210) |
| Kai | 2013.06 | 84 | 2016.03 | 3-5 | 9, 22 & 43 | open carport | 45 | Zoe (Q210) |
| Kai | 2013.06 | 86 | 2016.12 | 3-5 | 9, 22 & 43 | open carport | 54 | Zoe (Q210) |
| beatus | 01.2015 | 98 | 2016.03 | 5-7 | 14-43 | 10 | Zoe (Q210black) | |
| decalco | 2013.03 | 102 | 2016.03 | 6-7 | 6.4 & 22 | open | 56 | Zoe (Q210) |
| most | 2016.02 | 105 | 2016.03 | 2-5 | 22 | open | 2 | Zoé (R240) |
| JBS-EP Tender | 2013.03 | 102 | 2016.05 | 3-4 | 7 | open (near Paris) | 49 | Zoe (Q210) |
| bene | 2015.10 | 96 | 2016.10 | 5-6 | 22 | open | 23 | Zoe (R240) |
| Claude | 2013.05 | 84 | 2016.10 | 2-3 | 11 | closed garage | 40 | Zoé |
| Bernd | 2014.12 | 72 | 2017.01 | 3-5 | 22 | open carport | 17 | Zoé (Q210) |
| Claude | 2013.05 | 82 | 2017.01 | 2-3 | 11 | closed garage | 41 | Zoé |
| Lorenzo | 2014.10 | 81 | 2016.09 | 22 | open | Zoé | ||
| Fidelio | 2013.03 | 102 | 2017.01 | 3-4 | 22 | open | 72 | Zoé (Q210) |
| Grejazi | 2014.06 | 101 | 2017.03 | 7-21 | 2.3 & 3.7 | closed garage / carport | 40 | Fluence |
| FrancescZOE | 2013.10 | 86 | 2017.05 | 1-2 | 4.6 | closed garage | 38 | Zoé (Q210) |
| evzone | 2015.06 | 80 | 2017.05 | 3 | 2.3 | carport | 18 | Zoé |
| Bruce | 2015.05 | 94 | 2017.05 | 1-2 | 7 | closed garage | 5 | Zoé (Q210) |
If you want to contribute, please leave a comment in the current post with all relevant information. I will then integrate it into the table and delete the comment.
For reference only, here a table that indicates the settings for the given charging power.
| Power (kW) | Phases | Current (A) |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 | 1 | 15 |
| 3.7 | 1 | 16 |
| 4.6 | 1 | 20 |
| 7 | 1 | 32 |
| 9 | 3 | 13 |
| 11 | 3 | 16 |
| 22 | 3 | 32 |
| 43 | 3 | 63 |
About the Zoe battery
The Zoe has a 26 kWh battery pack (rated capacity), see this document, page 60: 12 modules * 16 cells * 3.75 volt * 36 Ah = 25.92 kWh. However, it’s life would be severely shortened if using that capacity. The BMS caps the capacity by roughly just under 10% on both the charged as well as the discharged end. This saves a lot of battery stress but reduces the capacity to a usable 22 kWh. If you want to know more about how these type of cells should be treated, here is a good link.
May I suggest another keyword? A factor of importance might be the general cycle depth. My car for instance is always charged at night, but often runs only a few 10ths of kilometers a day. I would call that “shallow cycle”. People doing a 95 km one way commute every day, charging at work, I would call that a “deep cycle”. Word in the street is that deep cycles are a bit better for SOH.
Can the app show the next decimal place in a future release?
Sorry, there are no decimals available for this information.
Using field “0x7bb, 80, 87, 2, 1, 0, 10, Bat SOH%3ld.%01ld, %, 0x2161, 0x6161, , 1, 0, 0\n” it is possible to get 0.5% precision, like 90.5 91.0 91.5, but no more than that.
You can also compare health by Capacity in Ah, but it’s not Renault’s official measure for battery changes.
Cheers Alexandre, I was wondering if my battery was closer to 99% SOH because I can get really good mileage.
One thing I have noticed with the software (while testing a 43kw post) is that it still says 1 phase even though its a 3 phase connection.
I’ve already been able to evidence a brand of charger (evolt) which is held back to 17kw when charging on AC instead of (siemens comparable) 40.4kw (on an equally low SOC battery).
Great software, keep up the great work.
You can easily see if the charger is holding back or the car is. “Available charging power” is what the charger is stating as max. “Max battery charge/regen” is what the car can absorb given the SOC, temperature and maybe some other black magic. Some fast chargers, even wehn not load balancing with other cars being charged, have a nasty habit of starting low and then slowly “turning up the volume”. This is rather “not done” IMHO when you have to pay by the minute.
Some people suggested to crowd-sticker chargers “checked by CanZe: xx kW”, hehe.
AFAIK Tesla and Nissan state their capacities in rated kWh, while Renault is “too honest” and states usable. In all fairness, in the Tesla you can “emergency use” most of that excess with a manual override.
Hallo Zusammen,
hier die Beobachtungen zu meiner ZOE.
Gekauft 06/2013.
06/2013 0km 100% (Hoffentlich)
07/2014 13400km 98% Renault Batteriereport
12/2014 18800km 96% iCarsoft 907
02/2015 21150km 96% iCarsoft 907
04/2015 23960km 94% iCarsoft 907
10/2015 31263km 92% iCarsoft 907
Ich lade 1-2 mal pro Woche meist mit 22kW. Im Sommer lade ich mit 7kW
wegen des Lärms der Klimaanalge zur Batteriekühlung. Der Wagen steht immer in einem offenen Carport.
Thank you for your data Sten. Here is a tip: If you put your car in ECO mode before switching it off and then connect your charger, the fans will not kick in (or much, much later)
My data:
ener73 2013.06 102 4-5 22 – 7,4 closed garage 62 Zoé
That is insanely good!
I have some doubts on this SOH value… Why many users have exactly 102 SOH ?? Is this value reliable?
You are completely free to have doubts. Feel free to cross check with an i907 or your dealer.
FYI iCarsoft 907 will set you back about £120 for Zoe. 😉 You guys should be at least token charging for your CanZe its that good.
Thanks for the heads up and most appreciated 🙂 We have discussed this amongst us just a few days ago. While we most certainly do not dislike money, there is a feeling that for the probably relative minute amount that would come in, the risk of getting into an argument about it is simply not worth it. Maybe we will change our minds 😉
For remark:
Datas were taken after using the whole capacity-range of the battery for min. 3 times because of having some long runs to handle.
When using only 50% of capacity-range for a longer time the datas for capacity is still smaller. I think the BMS can only calculate a correct capacity when discharging the battery down to warning because the discharging curve is not linear….
Hello team,
here are the current health states of our two Zoe cars.
THellweg – 2014.08 – 94% – 5-7 – 22kW – open – 35tkm – Zoe (210white)
THellweg – 2015.12 – 96% – 5-7 – 22kW – open – 11tkm – Zoe (210black)
Remarks:
The white car was ordered as a new car so its manufacturing date will not differ much from the purchase date.
The black car was purchased in december 2015 with a mileage of 7tkm already driven – but it is a 2013.05 model.
Here are the details:
Before we bought it the car was used as a demonstartor and rental car (for customers) by the car dealer.
It´s real fabrication date is 2013.05 (the problematic period) and indeed – serious charging problems occured after some time.
Therefore the car dealer installed a new motor, a new charger, a new batterie and an new TCU in 2015.05.
We were told that the displayed mileage of 7.4tkm is from the period 2015.05 until 2015.12 when we bought it.
The batterie health was displayed with 98% in december until it decreased some days ago from 98% directly down to 96%!
I drove 3.5tkm with it from the end of december till mid-february and charged 5-7 times/week with 22kW.
This is the same mileage than before with the white one that is now driven (with fewer mileage, 1.2tkm/month) by my wife.
I was surprised that the health state jumped down 2% at once and now I´m concerned that the health state will continue to decrease so rapidly. But most confusing of all for me is that I see a lot of cars in the list with more than 100% health state.
Maybe this health state parameter is made of 50% “black magic” !?
All the values are taken with CanZE.
Thank you for this great software product!
Cheers,
Thomas
Hi Jeroen and all team,
thanks for the very useful app. I even bought a cheap Android tablet for it (and only it) and love using it on longer travels. I love especially the consumption screen. Now, since you’ve announced that Frédéric is building up CanZE for iOS I just can’t wait to have an early alpha installed and tested. The WiFi dongle is already on it’s way from China… 🙂
Thanks,
keep up the excellent work!
Matthias
Thank you Matthias for the heads up.
My pack dropped from 96% on 15th to 91% on 17th. 🙁
Are you making frequent shallow charging ? (typically every night)
Not really. I tend to charge twice a week, although it’s a full charge from low SOC.
I’ve also go on long trips occasionally which may need 10 rapid charges.
Having dropped to 91% it’s now recovered to 92% and seems to be staying there.
Rapid is 43 kW ? How many such long distance trips per year ?
Seems the SOH estimate is not necessarily reliable: I’ve been reading of a test with 75% SOH and still 22 kWh available when actually making a trip (in spite of 17,5 kWh capacity announced).
Maybe only 2-3 a year, but as much as 500miles at constant 70mph (other than stopping for charge)
My car now shows 21.6kwh but I just covered 122.6miles on a single charge and yet I used 23kwh (no charge top ups).
My actual regen per charge now seems to have gone up a lot too. Used to be 1kwh per 22kwh but now more like 4kwh per charge as regen.
The battery of my Fluence ZE which was at 84% SOH last year is now at 76%.
It was 75% in july, but … I did not used the car for a dozen of day this summer and the SOH came up to 94% .
It took three weeks and more than 500 km to go back from 94% to 76%.
Hi to all,
i’ve buy my Zoe in 10/2014. Now it’s 81% of SoH. It’s ever charged with a 22kw external charging station. In the winter the temperature drop below -10 celsius degree.
Lorenzo
Hi to all.
I was doing a research on the Zoe.I am curious to know how you all are able to tell the Battery Health Status?
Ehhhh … using CanZE of course 😉
I would like to add my data as well:
Zoé (Q210 with 43 kW charger) purchased Dec. 2014; now 17500 km; typically charged in an open carport with 22 kW, 3-5 times a week.
SOH Level is at 72% now.
Ist the SOH Level critical (battery is coming to an end) or directly linked to the temperatures we have currently (-10 °C in southern Germany)?
You should check with your dealer to get it replaced. I think the limit for the SOH is 75%, so your below 😉
Thanks Bob,
That’s what I already did. But the usual dealer can not help. I have to contact an authorised ZE station to verify the status. But the next one is not around the corner
Hi Bob,
Just to give a short update on what happened meanwhile.
I came in contact with the next authorized ZE station (Bellemann, Speyer) and they performed very well. They confirmed the SOH value and managed the BMS update.
Now, the SOH is 99% and I am enjoying 40 km more to drive.
Thanks to you and the team for programming this nice CanZE tool.
Greetings
Bernd
Hello Berd. My question is, the BMS firmware could give you 40km more of track ? incredible. DO the EV dealer advise owners to update it? it is done on regular revisions ever year?
Salute from spain
Francesc
Hi Bob, I am making charts of this data. Is it possible to add the date when measured to this table?
See: http://www.renaultforum.nl/forum/batterij-gezondheid-meten-t20004-275.html#p171137
Many thanks, Harm.
Yes, I’ll do it right away, but I can’t say if I can track back all dates …
Ufff … I still had all the mails in the Trash, so getting the dates wasn’t that complicated.
If you will see some “rule”, please inform us, so we can post it 😉
Great, thanks!
Hello, i would like to add my data, too. Although i´m not sure, if the SOH is correct (read with CanZE and Maxi Scan 902):
P: 2013/3 SOH: 102% DM: 2017/01/30 CpW: 3-4 CP: 22kW CPlace: Open KM: 72 Car: Zoe (Q210)
The data is perfectly correct. 102% SOH means that your battery is top. In fact, I think batteries are being delivered with some kind of “extra space” …
I noticed something else, too: The indicated battery kilometers exceed the driven kilometers indicated by the car itself by over 10k km. Does this mean, my battery was used in another car before it was installed in mine?
Only Renault could tell you …. 😉
Grejazi – 2014.06 – 101 – 2017.03 – 7-21 – 2.3 & 3.7 – closed garage / carport – 40 – Fluence
Battery health Status update at 40.004km Battery temperature 30°C – after some longruns with discharging down to less than 20% of capacity.
In January at 37.000km SOH=98%.
So, just to get it right: Your SOH did grow up from 98% to 101% ??
Yes. In january (37890km Battery Temp. 10°C) the calculated SOH was 98%. And actually in march (40004km Battery Temp. 30°C) the calculated SOH is 101%.
I’m now down at 88% SOH with 26,000 miles on clock. But got car booked into dealer on 11th to see if the BMS update will restore lost health.
Got my ZOE 2 months ago. SOH 80%. Just did a range test and achieved 181km. According trip report: Consumption 22kWh, saved: 2kWh = ca. 20kWh usable battery capacity
Previous owner charged with most of the time with 2.3kWh, not known how often per week, the supposed data:
evzone 2015.06 – 80 – 2017.05 – approx .3? – 2.3 – carport – 18 – ZOE
The SOH seems somewhat low to me given the achieved range…and consumed kWh?
Sandy here. SOH now showing 85% at 27k miles. Car is going into garage in 2 days for a hopeful BMS update.
Hello Sandy, any good news on BMS update? To all other users, do you advise a visit to garage for this?
From what I heard (but I am not sure this correct) Renault informed it’s dealers that the update should be applied if AND ONLY IF:
– balancing (99% to 100%) takes a very long time;
– battery degradation seems extremely fast
Not yet. I used a new dealer, they had car 9 days and didn’t do a darn thing.
Going to a better one on 20th as they were recommended by folk who had a successful BMS update.
So I’ll report back around the 22nd hopefully.