<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Battery Charging Prediction Model revisited	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://canze.fisch.lu/2016/07/13/battery-charging-prediction-model-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://canze.fisch.lu/2016/07/13/battery-charging-prediction-model-revisited/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:22:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeroen Meijer		</title>
		<link>https://canze.fisch.lu/2016/07/13/battery-charging-prediction-model-revisited/#comment-419</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeroen Meijer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canze.fisch.lu/?p=1020#comment-419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, I tested it on a rapid today and was pleased with the results. It was actually a bit conservative, there was more charge in the battery than predicted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I tested it on a rapid today and was pleased with the results. It was actually a bit conservative, there was more charge in the battery than predicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
